
Digitizing Clinical Guidelines for the Management of Childhood Illness in Primary Care in Low and Middle-Income Countries (LMICs)
Project summary
Efforts to improve the diagnosis and management of childhood illness in primary care are a key component of the strategy to reduce under-five mortality in resource-constrained settings. Digital technologies such as Clinical decision support systems (CDSS) provide opportunities to strengthen quality of care and have recently been recommended by WHO as interventions for health systems strengthening.
Four humanitarian and research organisations have developed such CDSS in low and middle-income countries (LMICs), with evidence to indicate that their implementation can improve health worker performance including adherence to the Integrated Management of Childhood Illness (IMCI) guidelines. Developing the clinical algorithms that underpin these CDSS however, requires translation of narrative guidelines to decision logic, which often requires a degree of interpretation.
In order to promote transparency and work towards best practices around CDSS developments, the GSPI, in partnership with the Geneva Health Forum, has initiated a working group of practitioners, scientists, and policy actors working on IMCI-related CDSS. Based on a comparative analysis of the development of the clinical algorithms of each of the four CDSS, the working group will generate new learning and knowledge on digitization processes, contribute to the most recent work of the World Health Organization in this field, and provide a platform for discussion on clinical algorithm development with a wider audience.
Poor quality of care is estimated to result in 5 million excess deaths per year in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). The World Health Organization (WHO) has drawn particular attention to the need to improve quality of care for children as part of the strategy to reduce under-five mortality. As part of the Integrated Management of Childhood Illness (IMCI) strategy, simple, structured clinical guidelines have been provided to support health workers to implement evidence-based care. IMCI has been rolled out to over 100 countries and may reduce child mortality by 15% when fully implemented. Yet adherence to the clinical guidelines by frontline health workers, faced with the difficult task of providing care with limited training and resources, remains low in many countries.
Digital technologies provide new opportunities to strengthen quality of care and have recently been recommended by WHO as interventions for health systems strengthening. Clinical decision support systems (CDSS) are digital tools that provide tailored step-by-step guidance through a consultation, aiming at decreasing mis-interpretation of the narrative guidelines by the endpoint users, and have been shown to improve health worker performance including adherence to guidelines
Four humanitarian and research organisations have developed child-health focussed CDSS in low and middle-income countries (LMICs), with evidence to indicate that their implementation can improve health worker performance including adherence to the Integrated Management of Childhood Illness (IMCI) guidelines. The creation of these digital tools – taking into account contextualised users’ experience – led to modifications of the clinical pathway content and generated critical learning for further efforts to promote and harmonise the digitisation of clinical guidelines.
The process aims to conduct a comparative assessment of the content and structure of the clinical decision support systems (eCDSS) digitized by various organisations and generate best practices that can benefit the diverse community of policy, humanitarian, scientific and private satekholdesr involved in clinical guidelines digitization.
The overall impact of the process is to improve standardisation of approach to algorithm development to enhance the quality and transparence of clinical decision rules proposed to frontline health worker and advance the development of international policies and practices in this field.
- Working group constitution around an agenda collectively adopted
- Round table discussions during working group sessions with written input provided by members between sessions through semi-structured questionnaires and feedback on draft documents
- Comparison between the included CDSS based on participants’ reflections on the CDSS characteristics and processes of development and / or implementation
- Drafting and publication of a white paper
- Public and expert engagement activities around results
Duration
Project core partners
Geneva Science-Policy Interface (GSPI)
Médecins Sans Frontières (MSf)
Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute (SwissTPH)
Terre des hommes (Tdh)
Department of Digital Health and Innovations, World Health Organization (WHO)
Department of Sexual and Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organization (WHO)
Foundation for Innovative New Diagnostics (FIND)
Ifakara Health Institute
International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC)
UniSanté
Geneva Health Forum (GHF)
Contact
Frédérique Guérin, frederique.guerin @ unige.ch
Other Projects:
Satellite imagery as evidence in international justice proceedings [ICP 2022]
Collaboration project
A global diabetes research agenda [ICP 2022]
Collaboration project
This project seeks to address the research-policy gap in the field of diabetes by developing a policy-relevant, scientifically rigorous global research agenda on diabetes that can be acted upon by the newly launched WHO’s Global Diabetes Compact.
A toolbox for measuring immigrant integration and inform programming [ICP 2022]
Collaboration project
This project seeks to bring more effective policy expertise in the management of migration in the Latin America and the Caribbean (LAC) region in order to address migrants’ needs and increase social cohesion between migrant and local communities.
Mitigating the unintended humanitarian impacts of UN targeted sanctions [ICP 2021]
Collaboration project
This project seeks to bring together UN Sanctions scholars with global humanitarian actors to explore ways to ameliorate the humanitarian consequences of UN targeted sanctions.
Building resilient migration management systems: Developing a World Migration Report digital toolkit for policy officials [ICP 2021]
Collaboration project
This project develops an interactive digital toolkit for policy officers to support them in leveraging migration research for evidence-based policy-making, drawing lessons for the scientific community for brokering knowledge in policy circles.
Disruptive technologies and rights-based resilience [ICP 2021]
Collaboration project
This project aims to facilitate a multistakeholder consultative process to identify knowledge gaps, generate new evidence and co-design evidence-based tools to support regulatory and policy responses to human rights challenges linked to digital technologies.
Supporting Multilateral Environmental Agreements on chemicals and waste with scientific evidence [ICP 2020]
Collaboration project
This project aims to foster engagement of the scientific community to support informed policymaking and effective implementation of the Multilateral Environmental Agreements (MEAs).
REDEHOPE: Reliable Data for Evidence-Based Housing Policies [ICP 2020]
Collaboration project
Based on the rigorous study of existing data ecologies, the project intends to develop a diagnostic tool to help countries identify issues in their housing data ecology, respond appropriately to such issues and access appropriate datasets to formulate more robust, evidence-based housing policies for the benefit of people.
MAPMAKER: MArine Plankton diversity bioindicator scenarios for policy MAKERs [ICP 2020]
Collaboration project
Global marine biodiversity supplies essential ecosystem services to human societies. To protect them, information on the impact of climate-mediated loss of biodiversity on their function needs to be produced and taken into account in international agreements and policy documents.
Establishing a Consortium for “Public Good” Data on the Politics of Energy Transition [ICP 2020]
Collaboration project
Promoting coordination and synergies between practitioners, scientists and policy actors to produce relevant “public good” datasets is key to support more informed and efficient transition policies.